Email API
Calendar API
Contacts API 
Scheduler
Notetaker API
Google email & calendar integration
Outlook email & calendar integration
IMAP integration
Google Meet integration
Zoom integration
Microsoft Teams integration
Calendar management
Embedded contextual email
Scheduling automation
Automated outreach
Expense management
Customer relationship management
Applicant tracking system
Communications platform
Marketplaces
Document management
Docs
SDKs
Tutorials
API status
Changelog
Support
Blog
Events
Guides
Inspiration gallery
Build vs. buy
Customer stories
Security & Compliance
Why Nylas
Newsroom
Jump to section
Jump to section
Quick summary:
Compares three approaches for integrating Microsoft Teams meeting recording and transcription into SaaS applications: Microsoft Graph API, custom meeting bots, and unified APIs.
What you’ll learn:
- How Microsoft Graph API’s authentication complexity and recording limitations create months of development overhead
- Why unified APIs handle cross-platform meeting bots, transcription, and calendar sync with weeks instead of months of development time
Who it’s for: Platform builders who want to to build meeting intelligence features without sacrificing engineering resources or time-to-market.
Let’s say you’re building a SaaS application that captures customer data. Like a CRM, or an ATS, or an EHR system. Would you be surprised if a customer told you that they would switch to a competitor if you couldn’t offer them a feature that automatically captures and processes meeting data?
We were always curious to know just how urgent meeting features are for SaaS users, and we learned that the urgency is up there. Turns out 94% of SaaS users would consider switching if competitors offered better meeting recording features, with 68% willing to make that switch within six months.
Microsoft Teams sits at the center of many Fortune 100 companies’ tech stacks, making an integration to record Teams meetings a worthwhile business priority for any product building meeting features.
We’ve built integrations for Teams before, so we know that’s not straightforward. Keep reading for a comparison of integration pathways you can take for your product (and what you should avoid).
What does a Teams integration look like?
Though Teams does have meeting AI offered through Copilot, it’s missing a big component that SaaS companies can provide: A bridge for meeting data to reach a company’s tech stack and become something more than just data.
With a Teams integration, you could automatically capture sales call transcriptions to a CRM and sync insights to deal records. Or you could help hiring teams create searchable interview archives to speed up high-volume hiring cycles.
But building an integration to handle this at scale requires a few things that also eat into your roadmap:
- A simple authentication flow for users
- Programmatic retrieval of data for scheduled meetings, and a direct calendar integration
- Reliable access to meeting recordings and transcription data
- Compliance with organizational policies
With 85% of SaaS users expect meeting capabilities built directly into their existing workflows, you need a reliable Teams integration that also feels native to your product rather than an add-on. Depending on the integration route you take, there will be trade-offs that determine when you go to market and what you go to market with.
| Approach | Development complexity | Ongoing maintenance |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Graph API | High (Complex OAuth setup, tenant permission requirements, manual recording triggers) | High (OAuth complexity, API updates, cross-tenant permission issues) |
| Microsoft’s Bot Framework + Real-time Media Platform | Very High (C# and .NET Framework requirement, Windows server deployment, Real-time Media Platform setup) | Very High (OAuth complexity, UI changes, API updates, Windows infrastructure maintenance) |
| Nylas Notetaker API | Low (Single API integration, handles authentication and infrastructure) | Low (Nylas handles platform maintenance and updates) |
Understanding each approach to integrating Microsoft Teams meetings
Let’s briefly walk through what each implementation path would involve.
Microsoft Teams Graph API
What you get with this integration:
- Post-meeting access to transcripts and recordings
- Meeting creation and management capabilities
- Access to meeting metadata and participant information
Where developers run into challenges:
- Complex OAuth 2.0 setup with Microsoft Entra ID registration
- Cannot programmatically start recordings – users must manually click “Record” every time
- Only the meeting organizer or users explicitly granted access can retrieve recordings. Even with proper OAuth scopes, you’ll receive 403 errors if the recording wasn’t shared with your application’s designated user account.
- For multi-customer SaaS applications, you would need separate authorization for each customer’s tenant.
- Transcript quality depends on meeting audio quality, while post-processing needs to be handled separately.
What building this integration could look like:
Going down this route leads to months of infrastructure work to make Graph API production-ready for your app. You’re looking at close to six months to build this out. Then there’s the ongoing monthly maintenance. You need resources to monitor Graph API updates, handle customer troubleshooting immediately, and make sense of complex tenant-to-tenant permissions.
“But what if I successfully build this out myself after six to eight months?”
Successfully building this out is one thing. Making sure it works consistently and reliably 100% of the time is another. With so many invisible failure points, the chances of something breaking every now and then is high. You need to make sure you have hands on deck to put these fires out without disrupting end user experiences and causing churn.
Building your own meeting bots (Microsoft’s Bot Framework + Real-time Media Platform)
What you get with this integration:
- Real-time access to meeting audio and video for live processing or automated recording
- Service-hosted or application-hosted media processing options
- Custom meeting workflows and participant interaction control
Where developers run into challenges:
- Bot Framework alone cannot capture audio/video. You have to use Microsoft’s Real-time Media Platform for any programmatic meeting recording or media access, making this a more complex build.
- Requires C# and .NET Framework, deployed on Windows Server/Azure only
- Complex Microsoft Graph permissions and Bot Framework registration
- Real-time Media Platform adds infrastructure complexity and can call for Windows Server expertise requirements
- Building custom transcription requires integrating with external speech-to-text services
What building this integration could look like:
The Bot Framework handles meeting participation (joining, chat, events), but any audio/video capture requires the Real-time Media Platform on top of it. This path means building a Windows-based infrastructure that only works with Teams. You would need separate bot infrastructure for Google Meet and Zoom.
The implementation is complex and restrictive, so many developers end up building simpler chat-only bots instead of media-capable ones.
Deploying meeting bots with the Nylas Notetaker API
What you get with this integration:
- A single API for recording Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and Zoom meeting bots
- Built-in transcription with speaker identification powered by an AssemblyAI integration
- Calendar synchronization and automated scheduling
- Enterprise compliance (SOC-2, HIPAA, GDPR) handling
- Webhook notifications when both recordings and transcripts are ready
What building this integration could look like:
Single API integration that handles meeting bot deployment, transcription processing, and calendar automation across all major platforms. Most teams complete integration within weeks. The API handles bot infrastructure, platform maintenance, and transcription processing, so you can focus on building your product instead of maintaining meeting infrastructure.
Should you avoid handling Microsoft Teams integrations yourself?
If you do end up building a Teams integration internally, there are a few factors that could easily eat into your development cycles:
Authentication complexity
- Microsoft Entra ID app registration, Bot Framework setup, and Real-time Media Platform configuration across Windows Server infrastructure
- Cross-tenant permission management. Each customer organization has to configure access settings and trust relationships for your application
- Building tenant-specific error handling and customer IT documentation for environment setup vs. using a single OAuth flow that works across Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet.
Recording limitations
- No programmatic recording control with just the Graph API. Every meeting depends on manual “Record” button clicks and you would have to build complex workarounds for that, like using the Real-time Media Platform.
- Organizer-only file access creates invisible authorization failures vs. bots that join any meeting they’re invited to regardless of host permissions
Nylas is the unified API for integrating meeting data from Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and Zoom
The Nylas Notetaker API was built to help developers avoid these limitations and cut down time spent on integrations. This is the method you would opt for if you want production-ready, cross platform meeting data to build into your AI products.
With 73% of users prioritizing calendar and SaaS workflow integrations for meeting features, building with Nylas helps you meet core market demand for unified, embedded meeting intelligence.
Ready to get started?
Create a Nylas account for free to record up to 5 hours of meetings free!
